VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessResearch PaperVol. 4 No. VI (2021)pp. 511–520

An Accession to the Everlasting Tussle between Parliament and Judiciary: An Empirical Study on the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill and a Critical Analysis on the Case DR. Laxmanroa Patil vs Chief Minister, Maharashtra

View PDF
1,022views735downloads
Published 24 November 2021 · pp. 511–520 · Vol. 4 No. VI (2021)
Abstract

India since the beginning has been a democratic state with well defined doctrine of separation of powers between the three bodies namely the legislature, the executive and the judiciary, and to keep a check on them the doctrine of rule of law also applies to the three bodies”. There has been very rare instances in the history, where a tussle has taken place between the authorities, and enactment of the “127th amendment bill” is one such instance. The paper enunciates the pre-requisite knowledge regarding the previous amendments along with the case analysis in depth where the conflict of interest arose. Subsequently, the paper has listed the analysis of the “127th amendement bill” and its impact on public employment along with the shortcomings as well.

Keywords
127th amendment billConstitution of indiapublic employmentshortcomings

How to cite

Sakshi Sahoo & Simran Sahoo, An Accession to the Everlasting Tussle between Parliament and Judiciary: An Empirical Study on the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill and a Critical Analysis on the Case DR. Laxmanroa Patil vs Chief Minister, Maharashtra, 4 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 511 (2021).

Cite this article

Sakshi Sahoo & Simran Sahoo, An Accession to the Everlasting Tussle between Parliament and Judiciary: An Empirical Study on the 127th Constitutional Amendment Bill and a Critical Analysis on the Case DR. Laxmanroa Patil vs Chief Minister, Maharashtra, 4 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 511 (2021).
Chat with us