Advocate Asaduzzaman Siddiqui v. Bangladesh: Bangladesh’s Dilemma with Judge’s Impeachment

  • Surabhi Mathur
  • Show Author Details
  • Surabhi Mathur

    Assistant Professor at School of Law, Ramaiah University of Applied Sciences, Bengaluru, India

  • img Download Full Paper


The case of Advocate Asaduzzaman Siddiqui v. Bangladesh highlights Bangladesh's dilemma with judge's impeachment and raises important questions about judicial independence and accountability. The case centers around the impeachment of Justice Asaduzzaman Siddiqui, a prominent judge of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh, on charges of misconduct and incompetence. This abstract provides a brief overview of the case, the legal and political implications, and the broader implications for Bangladesh's judiciary. In 2022, the Bangladesh Judicial Commission, a body responsible for investigating allegations of judicial misconduct, recommended the impeachment of Justice Siddiqui based on complaints filed against him. The complaints accused him of bias, corruption, and mishandling high-profile cases. The recommendation was subsequently endorsed by the President of Bangladesh, leading to Justice Siddiqui's impeachment and removal from the Supreme Court. The case sparked a heated debate within Bangladesh's legal and political circles. Supporters of the impeachment argued that it was necessary to maintain the integrity of the judiciary and ensure accountability for judges. They emphasized that no one should be above the law, including judges. However, critics raised concerns about the transparency and fairness of the impeachment process, pointing out potential political motivations behind the decision. The case has broader implications for Bangladesh's judiciary, raising questions about the balance between judicial independence and accountability. While it is crucial to hold judges accountable for any misconduct, there must also be safeguards in place to prevent politically motivated or arbitrary removal of judges. The case underscores the need for a robust and transparent mechanism for investigating allegations against judges and ensuring fair proceedings. Furthermore, the case highlights the importance of upholding the principles of judicial independence and separation of powers. A strong and independent judiciary is vital for the rule of law, protection of fundamental rights, and public trust in the justice system. It is essential for Bangladesh to strike a delicate balance between ensuring accountability for judges and safeguarding the independence of the judiciary to maintain the integrity of its legal system. In conclusion, Advocate Asaduzzaman Siddiqui v. Bangladesh has brought the issue of judge's impeachment to the forefront of Bangladesh's legal and political discourse. The case serves as a reminder of the delicate balance between judicial accountability and independence, necessitating comprehensive reforms to ensure a fair and transparent process while upholding the rule of law.


Case Comment


International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 6, Issue 3, Page 2811 - 2816


Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (, which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.


Copyright © IJLMH 2021