Abstract

The medico-legal examination of sexual assault survivors occupies a uniquely sensitive space at the intersection of criminal law, forensic science, and human rights. In India, the Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 2013 marked a decisive shift away from archaic, evidence-centric approaches toward a framework that foregrounds dignity, autonomy, and informed consent. This article undertakes an extensive doctrinal and critical analysis of medico-legal practices in the post-2013 landscape. It argues that although medical evidence continues to hold evidentiary relevance, its role must be carefully circumscribed to avoid overshadowing the lived experiences of survivors. By examining constitutional jurisprudence, statutory provisions, judicial trends, and implementation challenges, the article demonstrates that the true transformation of medico-legal processes lies not merely in legislative reform but in institutional culture and ethical practice. It further situates Indian developments within international human rights standards and proposes a comprehensive, trauma-informed model that harmonizes evidentiary rigor with the preservation of human dignity

Keywords