Home / Volume 9, Issue 1 / Case Comment on EMS Namboodripad v. T.N. Nambiar Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 9 Issue 1 756 - 761 February 9, 2026

Case Comment on EMS Namboodripad v. T.N. Nambiar

Lead author · Corresponding
Sreelakshmi B
Guest Faculty at ICREP, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kerala, India
Abstract

The fine line between Contempt and freedom of speech has been tested time and again, and the interpretation of reasonable restrictions of freedom of speech and expression while dealing with such cases by the judiciary has always been noteworthy. With the sudden boom in the use of cyberspace and particularly social media platforms, the number of contempt cases is now increasing. Judiciary, being the guardian of the Constitution, plays a crucial role and if the balance between A.19 (1) and 19 (2) is not properly kept, this can have a chilling effect on free speech. Thus, how sensitively the Judiciary deals with contempt cases is relevant, especially when such cases are increasing. In such a backdrop, this article will be a case comment on one of the landmark decisions on Contempt of Court.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 9, Issue 1, Page 756 - 761
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us