Home / Volume 9, Issue 1 / Breathless Justice: Is the Right to Clean Air… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 9 Issue 1 25 - 50 January 25, 2026

Breathless Justice: Is the Right to Clean Air a Constitutional Myth?

Lead author · Corresponding
Parvesh Malik
Advocate at Punjab and Haryana High Court, India
Co-author
Deman Baghla
Advocate at Punjab and Haryana High Court, India
Abstract

The present research scrutinizes whether the constitutional obligation of clean air in India has thus far only been doctrinally recognized or whether it has also become an enforceable right in practice. The paper is based on a constitutional discussion of Article 21 and the existing legislative framework, which includes the Air (Prevention & Control of Pollution) Act, 1981 and the Environment (Protection) Act, 1986, the judicial development of the right to life through the environmental protection, examination of the design and execution of the National Clean Air Programme (NCAP) and the National Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Programme (NAMP) as well as estimating the capabilities of the Central and State Pollution Control Boards in turning laws into favorable conditions for the environment. The work uses new empirical air-quality and health-burden data to show significant gaps: lack of consistency in the monitoring locations, low level of NCAP funds usage, seasonal crises (especially in the Indo-Gangetic Plain) and divide of authority among ministries and government tiers. Based on this diagnosis, the article points out the shortcomings of existing judicial remedies (mandamus, injunctions, continuing mandamus) and suggests both doctrinal and statutory innovations—binding city and sectoral air-budgets, an independent National Air Commission with rule-making and enforcement powers, statutory information rights, remediation escrow mechanisms, and calibrated administrative sanctions—to transform the right to clean air into its administrable and enforceable forms. The conclusion puts forward a tripartite roadmap for the courts, the legislature, and the executive that combines enforceable legal duties, strengthened technical institutions, and predictable financing to turn the constitutional promise into public health protection. The paper maintains that without such integrated legal-policy reform the "right to clean air" may continue as a partial doctrinal accomplishment rather than a civic entitlement.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 9, Issue 1, Page 25 - 50
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us