Home / Volume 7, Issue 6 / Incompetence of Self-Regulatory Laws for the Regulation of… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Article Volume 7 Issue 6 1962 - 1969 December 22, 2024

Incompetence of Self-Regulatory Laws for the Regulation of OTT Platforms in India

Lead author · Corresponding
Banani Adhikari
Assistant Professor & Research Scholar at USTM, Meghalaya, India
Download PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118819
Abstract

The digital age in India is characterised, among others, by the emergence of OTT platforms as one of the most significant cultural and technological development. The introduction of such over-the-top (OTT) applications, including Netflix, Amazon Prime Video, Disney+ Hotstar, among others, has remarkably influenced content consumption pattern of people in India. Such rapid expansion, however, has raised concerns regarding the efficacy of self-regulation and restriction of content. In the absence of an adequately defined legal framework, India has had to rely on the self-regulatory codes formulated by the OTT platforms to supervise and control content available. This article evaluates the advantages and shortcomings of self-regulation in India with a specific emphasis on over-the-top (OTT) platforms by analyzing the legal order and the implementation of the order with respect to the protection and restriction of freedom of expression and the regulation of the content.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 6, Page 1962 - 1969
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118819
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation