Home / Volume 7, Issue 6 / Electoral Bonds and Transparency: Analyzing the Supreme Court’s… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Article Volume 7 Issue 6 389 - 399 November 17, 2024

Electoral Bonds and Transparency: Analyzing the Supreme Court’s Stance on Political Funding in India

Lead author · Corresponding
Sonali Singh
Student in India
Download PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118533
Abstract

This article analyses electoral bonds and their link with the Right to Information, with specific reference to the latest Supreme Court ruling declaring electoral bonds unlawful. The RTI Act is a principle of democracy through which people can ask for information and official operations from the authorities. While electoral bonds as instituted as a method of financing political parties have been perceived to erode this transparency through anonymous contributions. The present judgement of Supreme Court which declares endorsable electoral bonds unconstitutional is a watershed event in Indian democracy. This judgment is examined for its ability to enhance democratic practice because political funding must be transparent and therefore open to public scrutiny.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 6, Page 389 - 399
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118533
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation