Research Scholar at Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India
Research Scholar at Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, India
This paper will critically investigate mob lynching, considering its historical background, social implications, and the efficacy of legislative instruments in the fight against this grave problem. The paper begins with tracing the origin of mob violence and identifying how cultural, political, and economic factors have, historically fuelled such acts. It depicts how the social hierarchies, colonial legacy, and community tensions culminated in bringing the institution of lynching, an innovation of vigilante justice, into existence. The paper then proceeds to discuss the social implications, including the disruption of social harmony, the erosion of law and order, and the psycho-social impact on those affected communities. It critically examines the existing architecture of law in India about the suitability to redress mob lynching and deliver justice to the victims. A study through case studies and judgment, uncover systemic problems that allow and perpetuate non-enforcement. In that regard, author has proposed a number of reforms, such as fortifying legal provisions, improving the training level of the law enforcing officers, enhancing community engagement, and setting up arrangements for offering support to the victims. This paper hence allows historical context, sociological insights, and legal analysis that can add meaning to the discourse on mob lynching and facilitate a more just society where the rule of law prevails over mob violence.
Research Paper
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 5, Page 1135 - 1146
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118354This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021