Home / Volume 7, Issue 2 / Navigating Cross-Border Insolvencies: Unraveling Centre of Main Interest… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 7 Issue 2 1283 - 1300 April 1, 2024

Navigating Cross-Border Insolvencies: Unraveling Centre of Main Interest Role and Imperative International Cooperation

Lead author · Corresponding
Yaiphabi Rajkumari
LL.M. student at Alliance school of law, India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.117195
Abstract

As globalization continues to expand, with global business integrations and complex multinational corporate structures, cross-border insolvency cases involving debtors and creditors from multiple countries are becoming more common. During the 2008 financial crisis, the insolvencies of major international corporations such as Lehman Brothers brought to light the difficulties in coordinating intricate cross-border legal actions across disjointed legal systems. The differences between national insolvency laws and procedures often impede the efficient administration of such cases. Central to these cases is identifying the debtor’s center of main interests (COMI), which determines the primary jurisdiction governing proceedings. This paper delves into an analysis of emerging legal frameworks and cooperation mechanisms that aim to facilitate cross-border insolvency proceedings and foster coordination among jurisdictions. It sheds light on international initiatives such as the UNCITRAL Model Law, which delineates procedures for recognizing foreign proceedings and determining COMI. Through a comparative analysis of case studies, the paper seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of these frameworks in streamlining cross-border proceedings, mitigating conflicts of law, and enhancing outcomes for stakeholders. Within this exploration, key challenges will be identified, including the unpredictability associated with COMI designations, gaps in harmonized procedures, and limitations in protocols for asset recovery and creditor coordination across borders. Drawing upon these findings, the paper proposes targeted reforms designed to fortify existing mechanisms for cross-border cooperation, ensuring their flexibility to adapt to evolving insolvency scenarios and promoting greater consistency. This study not only provide the research endeavors but also advocates for the advancement of legal harmonization in cross-border insolvency proceedings and the determination of COMI.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 2, Page 1283 - 1300
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.117195
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us