VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessArticleVol. 3 No. II (2020)pp. 979–983

The Indian Adaptation of Constitutional Mercy Provision

View PDF
12views0downloads
Published 16 May 2020 · pp. 979–983 · Vol. 3 No. II (2020)
Abstract

A Hamletian Dilemma- To Mercy or not to mercy. What are the responsibilities of the state when it decides to punish a person for a crime? The debate whether to retain or abolish the provision of mercy petition is unending. The negative implications of the provision have, in multiple cases, led to a public and media outcry for failure in the administration of justice, such as in the case of Afzal Guru, Nirbhaya, etc. This article traces the expediency of the powers to grant pardon prescribed in the Indian constitution, and the jurisprudence developed in the court of law. The article commences with the origin and the history of the provision, then explains its scope and intricacies. Furthermore, it justifies the necessity of the provision in spite of its repercussions, in the modern civilized society

Keywords
Mercy petitionArticle 72Article 161ClemencyPardoning powerDeath penalty

How to cite

Nachiket Kulkarni & Megha Phadkay, The Indian Adaptation of Constitutional Mercy Provision, 3 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 979 (2020).

Cite this article

Nachiket Kulkarni & Megha Phadkay, The Indian Adaptation of Constitutional Mercy Provision, 3 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 979 (2020).
Chat with us