Home Archives Volume 2, Issue 3 Articles Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Article Vol. 2 No. 3 (2019) PP. 87 - 91

The Case Arguing ‘Reason to Believe’ as Mens Rea

Lead author · Corresponding
Siddharth Pankaj Tiwari
National University of Juridical Sciences(NUJS), Kolkata, India
View PDF Full text
2 views 0 downloads
Abstract

Almost all the offences in the Indian Penal Code have been carefully defined so that they include the precise evil intent which is the essence of that particular offence. Different words which have been used in the IPC to denote mens rea are voluntarily', 'Corruptly', 'knowingly', 'dishonestly', ‘Wantonly’ or 'fraudulently' or the like. By using these words, the Indian Penal Code gives effect to the doctrine of mens rea. One of the terms used to denote mens rea used in IPC is “reason to believe” which has been defined in section 26 of the IPC as “A person is said to have reason to believe a thing, if he has sufficient cause to believe that thing but not otherwise.” This paper tries to analyse the term “reason to believe” and draws a comparison with mens rea with the help of the decided cases.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 2, Issue 3, Page 87 - 91
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue IV now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us