VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessArticleVol. 3 No. V (2020)pp. 395–400

Sentence Bargaining

U
Umamaheswari.USchool of Excellence in Law (Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University), India
View PDF
7views0downloads
Published 20 October 2020 · pp. 395–400 · Vol. 3 No. V (2020)
Abstract

There is a worldwide need for movement towards alternatives to judicial decision-making for legal disputes. In India, the most dreadful problems faced by the judiciary is the pendency of cases. Thus, with an aim to address the pendency of cases and bearing on mind the maxim "Justice Delayed is Justice Denied" the Indian legislators have introduced several legal mechanisms accelerating the criminal procedure. The most important among them are the guilty plea and sentence bargaining which came into force in 2006 by the Criminal Law Amendment Act, 2005. This article provides thorough research about the concept of sentence bargaining, types of sentence bargaining, and its impact on the criminal justice system with judicial pronouncements. The objective of this work is to analyze the Indian model of sentence bargaining and make suggestions that may be conducive for making it much more acceptable and effective in the Criminal Justice System of the country

Keywords
BargainingJudiciaryCriminal System

How to cite

Umamaheswari.U, Sentence Bargaining, 3 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 395 (2020).

Cite this article

Umamaheswari.U, Sentence Bargaining, 3 Int'l J. L. Mgmt. & Human. 395 (2020).
Chat with us