Abstract

The doctrine of pleasure has a profound impact on parliamentary oversight in both india and in the United Kingdom. The article explores the historical context , impact, criticisms , and potential reforms associated with this doctrine . In India, the doctrine allows for swift action against underperforming or no -compliant officials , while the potential for political influence and the lack of clear, codified safeguards remain points of discussion for those seeking a more robust framework for civil servant rights. While codified reforms are less prominent , calls for a clearer framework for exercising the royal prerogative and a prominent role parliamentary supervision in dismissals are emerging , Considering the criticisms and challenges associated with the doctrine , reforms and alternatives are being explored to address the challenges and ensure transparency , accountability, and the independence of the civil service . By striking a balance between efficient government and robust oversight, the future of parliamentary surveillance can be strengthened , ensuring the effective functioning of democratic governments.

Keywords