Abstract

The suggested passive euthanasia guidelines released by the Indian Union Health Ministry are discussed in this article. The guidelines attempt to establish a systematic and morally justified system for withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment (LST) in terminally ill patients. This system takes into account the right to die with dignity under Article 21 of the Constitution. Clinicians face a legal and moral dilemma in the care of patients at the end of life; these recommendations, prepared with the assistance of AIIMS specialists, are intended to assist. Among the conditions under which passive euthanasia may be warranted are brainstem death, treatment with no beneficial impact, and informed refusal by the patient or his representative, as covered in the suggestions. The landmark Supreme Court ruling in Common Cause v. Union of India (2018), legalizing passive euthanasia and facilitating living wills, is the foundation upon which this is based. With ensuring due medical and ethical diligence, the norms simplify previously complicated processes, ushering in a truce between the sanctity of life and death's dignity. The essay continues on to discuss the financial and psychological burdens of unnecessary treatment, emphasizing ways in which humane withdrawal of treatment can reduce suffering and preserve a patient's autonomy. Finally, we consider how the law is changing, from the judge-centered approach to a patient-centered approach, indicating a movement toward honoring patients' rights to decide for themselves regarding their end-of-life care. Finally, the standards proposed are a giant leap towards bringing medical practice in line with constitutional principles and ethical commitments to promote, within a firm legal framework, the humane care of terminally ill patients.

Keywords