The Effects of Corruption on Good Governance in Afghanistan: Lessons for Fragile States

  • Aramuddin Timory and Shaiwal Satyarthi
  • Show Author Details
  • Aramuddin Timory

    Research Scholar at Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India

  • Shaiwal Satyarthi

    Professor at Faculty of Law, University of Delhi, India

  • img Download Full Paper

Abstract

This conceptual paper explores the impact of Corruption on good governance in Afghanistan, with a specific focus on the judicial sector. Furthermore, the author used secondary data sourced from international organisations such as the World Bank, United Nations (UN), United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and United States Agency for International Development (USAID), as well as from peer-reviewed academic journals. This study aims to evaluate how Corruption affects judicial performance in Afghanistan and draw lessons from fragile and neighbouring Asian states. The findings reveal that Corruption undermines institutional trust, weakens judicial independence, discourages investment, and exacerbates social inequality. Theoretical perspectives from scholars such as Lambsdorff and Mauro emphasise the negative correlation between Corruption and economic development, highlighting its role in diminishing the quality of public service delivery. Case studies from post-conflict countries such as Sierra Leone, Liberia, Kenya, and Rwanda underscore the significance of transparent judicial appointments, strong anti-corruption enforcement, and sustained capacity building. Similarly, regional experiences from India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Iran, and Sri Lanka offer practical insights into judicial activism, civil society engagement, and transitional justice. Moreover, the study found the Afghan judiciary one of the most corrupt public institutions, characterised by political interference, inadequate infrastructure, and the prevalence of informal justice systems. The paper concludes that effective judicial reform in Afghanistan requires a context-sensitive, multi-stakeholder approach—combining political will, international cooperation, institutional restructuring, ethical training, and public engagement. By drawing on global best practices, Afghanistan can work toward building a transparent, independent judiciary that enhances public trust, strengthens the rule of Law, and contributes to long-term governance and stability.

Keywords

  • Afghanistan
  • Corruption
  • Fragile States
  • Good Governance
  • Judicial Sector

Type

Research Paper

Information

International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 8, Issue 3, Page 2069 - 2088

DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.1110062

Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © IJLMH 2021