Home / Volume 6, Issue 2 / Right to Self-determination – ICJ Advisory Opinion on… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Article Volume 6 Issue 2 2779 -2785 April 22, 2023

Right to Self-determination – ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965: A Critical Commentary

Lead author · Corresponding
Saumya Raj
Student at Ramaiah College of Law, Bengaluru, India
Abstract

In February 2019, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an advisory opinion on the legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965. The opinion centered on the right to self-determination, which is a fundamental principle of international law that grants people the right to freely determine their political status, economic, social and cultural development. The ICJ opinion found that the process by which the Chagos Archipelago was separated from Mauritius in 1965 was not in accordance with international law. The Court stated that "the decolonization of Mauritius was not conducted in a manner consistent with the right to self-determination" and that the United Kingdom's continued administration of the Chagos Archipelago is a "wrongful act." The ICJ also stated that all Member States of the United Nations have an obligation to cooperate to bring an end to the colonial situation in the Chagos Archipelago. The Court further declared that the United Kingdom must complete its withdrawal from the Chagos Archipelago as soon as possible. Overall, the ICJ opinion was a significant development in the ongoing struggle for the Chagossian people's right to self-determination. It reinforces the importance of this fundamental principle of international law and highlights the need for colonial powers to respect it in their dealings with other nations. However, the ICJ opinion is merely advisory and does not have binding legal force. It remains to be seen whether the United Kingdom will abide by the ICJ's findings and take steps to restore the Chagossian people's right to self-determination. Moreover, the opinion does not address the question of compensation for the harm caused to the Chagossian people as a result of their forced removal from the Chagos Archipelago. In conclusion, while the ICJ opinion on the legal consequences of the separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 is a significant development in the fight for the right to self-determination, more needs to be done to ensure that the Chagossian people are granted justice and restitution for the injustices they have suffered.

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 6, Issue 2, Page 2779 -2785
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue IV now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us