Abstract

The Uniform Civil Code (UCC), as envisioned under Article 44 of the Indian Constitution, proposes a single, unified legal framework to govern personal laws related to marriage, divorce, inheritance, and property—irrespective of religious affiliations. Historically, the idea of a uniform legal system can be traced back to the Lex Loci Report of 1840, which recommended the codification of laws concerning crimes, contracts, and evidence. However, the British colonial administration deliberately excluded Hindu and Muslim personal laws, reinforcing the policy of “divide and rule.” The essence of the UCC lies in ensuring legal equality and justice by eliminating discriminatory practices embedded within religious personal laws. However, despite being enshrined in the Directive Principles of State Policy (DPSP), the UCC remains a constitutional aspiration rather than a binding law. The challenge of implementing a uniform civil code in a nation as culturally and religiously diverse as India is immense, requiring a delicate balance between legal uniformity and social harmony. This paper critically examines the feasibility, challenges, and implications of drafting and implementing the Uniform Civil Code in India. It explores whether a truly just and inclusive UCC can be framed—one that upholds the principles of secularism, equality, and individual rights while being sensitive to India's pluralistic ethos.

Keywords