Research Scholar at University of Lucknow, India
LL.M. Student at Amity University, Lucknow, India
The urge to understand, get, and share correct information from a reluctant source is probably as old as the search for effective interrogation techniques. Another method for learning the truth or getting closer to it in the event of a crime is narco analysis, which also aids in investigations and questioning. The primary goal of a Narco analysis test is to elicit information from the accused while he is hypnotised, and the physicians and forensic psychologists present are solely responsible for this procedure. Tests conducted in front of police are frequently disregarded because they are seen to be pressured, and officers are not permitted to participate in any ongoing sessions of the test being administered. Since it is solely up to the accused or test-taker to decide whether to undergo the narco analysis test, the accused bears responsibility for his choice. Narco analysis within the Indian judicial system is the subject of this article. Its legitimacy with regard to Articles 20(3) and 21 and its statutory sanction under the Code of Criminal Procedure and Indian Evidence Act were the main topics of discussion.
Research Paper
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 6, Page 511 - 520
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118555This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021