Student at SASTRA Deemed University, India
Student at SASTRA Deemed University, India
While India’s Supreme Court recently declined to legalize same-sex marriages, there are rays of hope amid the complex and somewhat disappointing decision. This ruling followed extensive hearings and the consideration of 21 petitions by same-sex couples and activists, a case that had raised expectations for a historic shift toward marriage equality. Rather than immediately granting legal recognition to same-sex unions, the court opted to accept the government’s proposal to establish a committee. This committee will explore extending legal rights and benefits to same-sex couples, signaling a willingness to engage with the issue. The petitioners had passionately argued that the denial of marriage rights violated their constitutional guarantees, rendering them “second-class citizens.” Their proposed solution was seemingly straightforward: amending the Special Marriage Act to make it inclusive of same-sex unions.
Research Paper
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 6, Issue 6, Page 775 - 783
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.116119This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021