Abstract

The rapid expansion of cross-border e-commerce has fundamentally transformed global trade by enabling seamless transactions across jurisdictions, yet it has simultaneously exposed significant legal uncertainties concerning jurisdiction and dispute resolution. This research paper examines the complex jurisdictional challenges that arise when buyers, sellers, intermediaries, and digital platforms operate across multiple legal systems. It critically analyses how traditional principles of territorial jurisdiction such as place of contract formation, location of parties, and place of performance struggle to accommodate the borderless nature of online transactions. The study further evaluates the effectiveness of emerging legal approaches, including the “targeting test,” effects doctrine, and consumer protection-based jurisdictional rules, in determining appropriate forums for dispute adjudication. In addition, the paper explores the role of international frameworks and domestic regulations in harmonizing cross-border e-commerce governance. Instruments such as model laws, regional agreements, and national legislations are assessed to determine their ability to provide predictability and fairness in resolving disputes. The research also investigates dispute resolution mechanisms tailored to cross-border e-commerce, including online dispute resolution (ODR), arbitration, and mediation. It evaluates the growing significance of ODR platforms in offering cost-effective, efficient, and accessible remedies, especially for low-value, high-volume disputes typical of e-commerce transactions. At the same time, the study highlights concerns related to enforceability, procedural fairness, and digital inequality that may limit the effectiveness of such mechanisms. Through a comparative and analytical approach, the paper argues that while existing legal doctrines provide a foundational framework, they remain inadequate in addressing the dynamic and decentralized nature of cross-border digital trade. It emphasizes the need for greater international cooperation, harmonized legal standards, and technologically adaptive dispute resolution systems. The study concludes by proposing balanced regulatory approach that integrates jurisdictional clarity with flexible and user-centric dispute resolution models, thereby fostering trust, efficiency, and legal certainty in the global e-commerce ecosystem.

Keywords