Abstract

Cyberterrorism poses an increasingly complex threat at the intersection of national security, law, and technology. It is defined as the politically motivated use of cyberspace to inflict harm or create widespread fear and has gained global prominence due to the proliferation of digital infrastructure and the ease with which non-state actors can exploit cyberspace. This paper critically examines the legal and institutional frameworks addressing cyberterrorism, with a particular focus on the challenges posed by its cross-border nature, the anonymity of attackers, and the limitations of current investigative mechanisms. It analyses key international legal instruments including the Budapest Convention on Cybercrime, European Union directives, and United Nations resolutions, highlighting their scope and limitations in combating cyberterrorism. The paper scrutinizes India’s domestic legal regime, particularly Section 66F of the Information Technology Act, as well as institutional mechanisms like the National Investigation Agency and the Indian Cyber Crime Coordination Centre (I4C). It explores why India has refrained from joining the Budapest Convention and evaluates India’s reliance on Mutual Legal Assistance Treaties (MLATs) and emerging bilateral agreements for international cooperation. The study also assesses how counter-cyberterrorism efforts may affect fundamental rights such as privacy, freedom of speech, and due process, urging for a balanced legal approach. Drawing on recent incidents and policy developments, the paper concludes with recommendations for enhancing India’s legal and institutional responses while fostering international collaboration and protecting constitutional freedoms. The analysis is grounded in current data, legal provisions, and global best practices, offering a comprehensive framework to understand and address the evolving threat of cyberterrorism.

Keywords