Abstract

This paper examines the role of facial attractiveness in influencing judgments of criminality and culpability, with it’s central argument circling around the extra-legal factors related to appearance bias within the legal system. Drawing from evolutionary psychology, sociobiology, and cognitive bias theory, it explores how societal standards of attractiveness and perceived facial traits impact implicit associations with criminality. Via various studies on stereotyping and deviance, including insights from criminology, psychology, and cultural portrayals, this paper analyses mechanisms by which certain facial features—including but not limited to symmetry, tattoos, and perceived maturity—affect perceptions of guilt. Classic theories from Cesare Lombroso’s notion of a “criminal man” to modern media representations in Disney become illustrations for how deviancy has been stereotyped and construed over time. Empirical research findings show that attractiveness biases can influence judgment and sentencing, favouring attractive individuals in cases of minor or victimless crimes, yet reversing for cases where attractiveness may have played a more direct role in the offense. This paper highlights the need for critical scrutiny of facial bias in legal contexts, proposing that a lack of diverse data on beauty norms leaves potential gaps in understanding appearance-related biases.

Keywords