Abstract

In the intricate and often volatile realm of corporate affairs, power imbalances, internal disputes, and unchecked authority can significantly hinder the effective and equitable functioning of a company. Such dynamics frequently give rise to acts of oppression & mismanagement, particularly when those in positions of control exploit their power to the detriment of minority shareholders or the broader interests of the company. These issues not only erode the principles of fairness and accountability in corporate governance but also challenge the foundational tenets of corporate democracy and transparency. This article undertakes a comprehensive analysis of the legal concepts of oppression & mismanagement within the context of corporate entities, with a particular emphasis on their definition, scope, and the conditions under which such claims may arise. It provides a detailed exploration of the historical evolution of legal mechanisms developed to curb such practices, charting the legislative progress from earlier statutory provisions to the current regulatory framework under the Companies Act, 2013. Special attention is given to the interpretation of Sections 241-245 of the Act, which form the cornerstone of legal remedies available to aggrieved shareholders in India. It also addresses the landmark judicial precedents that have significantly contributed to the growth of jurisprudence in this domain. Additionally, this article also discusses about the recommendations to prevent oppression and mismanagement.

Keywords