Abstract

Succession laws determine how property is passed down through generations playing a pivotal role in shaping socio-economic hierarchies and reinforcing—or challenging—existing social norms. Despite that, they have long mirrored patriarchal structures, often marginalizing women and entirely excluding transgender individuals which is profoundly problematic as a fair and inclusive inheritance law can promote social justice and gender equality, while a biased one can perpetuate discrimination and inequality. The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 was a significant step toward codifying inheritance rights for Hindus, but it initially favoured male heirs, restricting women’s rights to some extent. Over time, legal reforms, particularly the 2005 amendment, have attempted to bridge these gaps by granting daughters equal coparcenary rights. However, data and judicial interpretation reveal that the practical implementation of these rights remains inconsistent, especially in rural areas where agricultural land—often excluded from the Act’s purview—is a primary asset. The paper also explores the largely unaddressed issue of inheritance rights for transgender individuals, who remain legally and socially invisible within existing succession laws. Despite progressive judicial recognition in cases like NALSA v. Union of India, the Hindu Succession Act and other personal laws continue to operate within a binary gender framework, leaving transgender persons in a legal vacuum vulnerable to exclusion and discrimination. Through an analysis of legal provisions and case laws, this paper highlights the progress made and the challenges that remain in ensuring truly inclusive and equitable succession laws. It argues that while the Hindu Succession Act has evolved, further reforms and judicial interpretations are needed to guarantee equal inheritance rights for all genders, ensuring that legal protections extend beyond just men and women to include the transgender community as well.

Keywords