ISSN 2581-5369
HeinOnline, MANUPATRA, Google Scholar Indexed
Difference in Treatment of Claim by the Liquidator and the IRP
-
Soni Maurya
Student at Dr. Harisingh Gour University, Sagar (A Central University), M.P., India
Abstract
In the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated under the I&B Code 2016 (Code), Claims are a very important concept in the IBC regime. Sections 18 and 25 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) lay down the duties of an interim resolution professional (IRP) and a resolution professional (RP) respectively. The provisions of Code strive on the protection of interest of creditors of a company which is under CIRP while completing the insolvency resolution process in a time-bound manner. The IBC is fortified with mechanisms to reduce and efficiently deal with the rejection of claims, creditors whose claims are rejected would continue to face prejudice.
Keywords
- Resolution Professional
- Liquidator & Interim Resolution Professional
Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 4, Issue 5, Page 1805 - 1807
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.112147Creative Commons
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2021