Student at Symbiosis Law School, Pune, India
Singapore is well known for taking a strong pro-arbitration position. One of the main benefits of international arbitration is confidentiality, which guarantees the effectiveness of the processes. Numerous judicial improvements have defined the evolution of confidentiality in this jurisdiction in recent times. In order to help parties, lawyers, and tribunals navigate their actions effectively, the author of this paper will address the ramifications of the confidentiality ruling in The Republic of India v. Deutsche Telekom. Even while this ruling is a step in the right direction, a closer examination reveals certain ambiguities that need to be clarified in subsequent decisions.
Case Comment
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 6, Page 96 - 101
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.118506This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution -NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright © IJLMH 2021