Home / Volume 4, Issue 3 / Development as freedom – Contributions and Shortcomings of… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 4 Issue 3 2854 - 2870 June 3, 2021

Development as freedom – Contributions and Shortcomings of Amartya Sen’s Development philosophy for Feminist Economics

Lead author · Corresponding
Kartikey Giri
Student at Gujarat National Law University, India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.11815
Abstract

Amartya Sen does not perceive women's oppression to be a miniscule dilemma. On the opposite end of the spectrum, the context of women's income disparity is fundamental to the Nobel laureate's concerns, and he considered himself as a proponent of so-called feminist economy. To what proportion can Amartya Sen's proposals about autonomy, — particularly his conception of development as freedom, strengthen millennial economic analysis? Sen's premise of inclusive freedom has many parallels and offers significant avenues for analysing gender discrimination. Sen's growing focus on equality as the overarching perceived norm for assessing interpersonal well-being and social sustainability adds complexity, not just for feminist research. We advocate a more explicitly secular democratic critique of competence, quality of life, and worth, reflecting on Sen's oeuvre and multiple feminist philosophers. In this study, we aim to evaluate the magnitude to which Sen's highly intensified emphasis on autonomy benefits feminist economists.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 4, Issue 3, Page 2854 - 2870
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.11815
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us