Home / Volume 6, Issue 3 / Comparative Analysis of International Arbitral Institution Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 6 Issue 3 3296 - 3305 June 23, 2023

Comparative Analysis of International Arbitral Institution

Lead author · Corresponding
Shiwani Priya
Advocate in India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.115235
Abstract

Arbitration is presently the most common way for states, people, and organisations to settle international disputes. As a result of increased globalisation of world trade and investment, specialised international arbitration practitioners who speak a common procedural language, whether they practise in England, Switzerland, Nigeria, Singapore, or Brazil, have become increasingly harmonised in their arbitration practises. And in recent times, international arbitration plays a key role in resolving cross border commercial disputes as there is no involvement of national courts which clearly indicates that there is no biasness in the procedure and award. These standardised practises are based on complex arbitration rules administered by organisations such as the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the American Arbitration Association (AAA), and the London Court of Arbitration Centre, which are located throughout Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and elsewhere. The standardised rules are themselves supported by enlightened national arbitration laws inspired by the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITAL) Model Law. The purpose was to maximize the effectiveness of the arbitral process and to minimize the judicial intervention. The result is a powerful edifice of laws and procedures, backed up by treaties like New York convention 1958, which impose an obligation on national courts around the world to recognise and enforce both arbitration agreements and arbitration award. The awards and the procedure followed by such institution greatly affect the procedure followed by the national courts. As it helps the national court to adopt flexible rules and modify their existing laws if there is any inconsistent. Such development in the national court can help the arbitrational process to be speedy mechanism. In this paper we are going to analysis first different types of international arbitration institution and secondly how they different from each other on different aspect.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 6, Issue 3, Page 3296 - 3305
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.115235
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us