Abstract

This paper offers a comparative analysis of democratic systems in India and Switzerland, focusing on the distinctions between indirect and direct democracy. India operates primarily under an indirect, representative democracy, where citizens elect representatives who make decisions on their behalf, reflective of its diverse population and complex federal structure. In contrast, Switzerland practices a direct democracy, where citizens actively participate in decision-making through referendums and initiatives. The paper examines the legal frameworks, political structures, and historical contexts that shaped these systems. India's model, influenced by its colonial history, emphasizes efficient governance for a large, diverse population, while Switzerland’s approach fosters direct citizen involvement in a smaller, more localized context. The study highlights the strengths and challenges of both systems, exploring how India’s indirect democracy balances representation with governance and how Switzerland’s direct democracy promotes citizen engagement but demands higher levels of political awareness. Ultimately, the paper suggests that hybrid models incorporating elements from both systems may enhance democratic governance worldwide.

Keywords