Abstract

Land, as a fundamental resource, underpins human existence, economic development, social structures, and cultural identities. The manner in which rights to access, use, manage, and control land are defined, allocated, and enforced profoundly shapes societies. Two dominant, yet often contrasting, paradigms of land tenure govern these relationships: private ownership and community land rights. Private ownership, characterized by individualized, exclusive, and transferable rights, has become a cornerstone of many modern legal and economic systems, particularly in the Western world and increasingly promoted globally. It is often associated with economic efficiency, investment security, and individual autonomy. Conversely, community land rights encompass a diverse array of systems where land is held, managed, and utilized collectively by a group, often based on customary norms, traditions, and shared identities. These systems are prevalent among indigenous peoples and local communities worldwide, emphasizing social cohesion, equitable access, sustainable resource management, and cultural continuity. This paper provides an introductory exploration of these two fundamental approaches to land tenure. It delves into the conceptual underpinnings, historical evolution, theoretical justifications, socio-economic implications, and inherent complexities associated with both private land ownership and community land rights. Furthermore, it examines the dynamic and often contentious interface between these systems, particularly in contexts where formal legal frameworks prioritizing private property intersect with long-standing customary tenure arrangements. The paper aims to illuminate the distinct characteristics, strengths, and weaknesses of each system, fostering a nuanced understanding of their roles in contemporary land governance challenges, including poverty alleviation, environmental sustainability, social justice, and conflict resolution. Ultimately, it underscores the critical need for context-sensitive approaches that recognize the legitimacy and value of diverse tenure systems in promoting equitable and sustainable development.

Keywords