Home / Volume 6, Issue 6 / Collegium System in India: Criticism, Comparison and Future Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 6 Issue 6 3463 - 3472 December 27, 2023

Collegium System in India: Criticism, Comparison and Future

Lead author · Corresponding
Aarya Maheshwari
Student at O.P. Jindal Global University, India
Co-author
Saksham Sharma
Student at O.P. Jindal Global University, India
View PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.116513
Abstract

In India, there has been a national debate about how judges of the Supreme Court and High Court are chosen. Prior to the establishment of the Indian Supreme Court, judicial appointments were primarily the responsibility of the executive. The collegium system, which the Chief Justice of India and senior judges of the Supreme Court use to make new appointments to the Supreme Court and the High Courts, was established by the Supreme Court in 1993. The Indian Supreme Court declared the law unconstitutional after Parliament amended the Constitution in 2014 and passed a bill to establish a commission to select judges. The collegium method of choosing and transferring judges in the higher courts has been the topic of much criticism, and it has been blamed on disagreements between the judiciary and the administration, as well as the slow pace of judicial appointments. Critics have pointed out that the system is opaque because there is no formal procedure or public accountability.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 6, Issue 6, Page 3463 - 3472
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.116513
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue III now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us