Abstract

The Union Budget is far more than a routine financial exercise—it reflects the government's policy direction, political priorities, and institutional frameworks. In India’s federal setup, where power and responsibilities are constitutionally distributed between the Centre and the states, budget allocations are ideally expected to follow principles of fiscal fairness, balanced regional development, and economic necessity. These allocations should, in theory, be impartial and shaped by data-driven assessments. However, recent budgetary trends have sparked significant debate. Observers have noted that states governed by political alliances aligned with the ruling party at the Centre, often appear to receive more generous financial support than states led by opposition parties. This trend has prompted important questions: How in several states where the alliances of BJP are in power have been given a better share in budget as compared to the states where the central government is not in power? Is there a rationale behind such an allocation? Or is it solely governed by party biases and coalition politics? To understand answers to these questions one must understand coalition politics, party biases, center state relations and how they impact the Budgetary allocation. By the end of this paper, all the questions listed above shall be answered. These issues bring forth a deeper concern about whether political loyalty or electoral strategy influences fiscal decisions, potentially sidelining objective criteria. Understanding the answers to these questions requires a thorough examination of the nature of coalition politics, the extent of party influence in governance, and the structure of Centre-State relations—all of which play a vital role in shaping budgetary outcomes. By exploring these dimensions, this paper seeks to provide clear insights into the above questions and critically evaluate whether India’s budget truly reflects economic rationale or political strategy.

Keywords