VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessCase CommentVol. 7 No. I (2024)pp. 658–663

Case Study on “Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and Others”, AIR 1991 SC 420

View PDF
1,311views633downloads
Published 22 January 2024 · pp. 658–663 · Vol. 7 No. I (2024)
Abstract

Article 32 of the Indian Constitution gives power to the apex court to protect the rights of the individual, and this provision has been broadly interpreted from time to time. The other magnificent provision of the Indian Constitution is Article 21, which protects the life and liberty of individuals, which is also the basic right of the individual and cannot be taken back by the state. The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is nowhere defined under the Indian Constitution, but this the mechanism is evolved by the Indian Judiciary.

Keywords
Fundamental RightsHuman RightsEnvironmentPollutionPIL

How to cite

Gauri Sharma & Harshit Naveen, Case Study on “Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and Others”, AIR 1991 SC 420, 7 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 658 (2024).

Cite this article

Gauri Sharma & Harshit Naveen, Case Study on “Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and Others”, AIR 1991 SC 420, 7 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 658 (2024).
Chat with us