Case Study on “Subhash Kumar v. State of Bihar and Others”, AIR 1991 SC 420
Lead author · Corresponding
Gauri Sharma
Student at ICFAI University, Jaipur, India
Co-author
Harshit Naveen
Student at ICFAI University, Jaipur, India
View PDF
Full text
DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.116772
Abstract
Article 32 of the Indian Constitution gives power to the apex court to protect the rights of the individual, and this provision has been broadly interpreted from time to time. The other magnificent provision of the Indian Constitution is Article 21, which protects the life and liberty of individuals, which is also the basic right of the individual and cannot be taken back by the state. The Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is nowhere defined under the Indian Constitution, but this the mechanism is evolved by the Indian Judiciary.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.