Home / Volume 6, Issue 3 / Case Analysis – Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Case Comment Volume 6 Issue 3 3121 - 3126 June 17, 2023

Case Analysis – Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose

Lead author · Corresponding
Abhimanyu Suresh Nawghare
Student at Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur, India
Abstract

Is the agreement or contract made into by a minor void or voidable in this case? The issue of whether a minor who lacks legal capacity enters into a contract and what scenarios and circumstances might result also comes into dispute. A person is a minor, according to Section 3 of the India Majority Act of 1875, if they have reached the age of 18, with the exception of situations in which a court has assigned a guardian, in which case they are said to have reached majority at the age of 21. Although everyone is capable of entering into a contract under the Indian Contract Act of 1872, Section 11, there are three exceptions: minors, those who are mentally ill, and people who are prohibited by law.

Type
Case Comment
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 6, Issue 3, Page 3121 - 3126
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue IV now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us