VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessCase CommentVol. 6 No. III (2023)pp. 3121–3126

Case Analysis – Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose

AN
Abhimanyu Suresh NawghareStudent at Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur, India
View PDF
1,169views672downloads
Published 17 June 2023 · pp. 3121–3126 · Vol. 6 No. III (2023)
Abstract

Is the agreement or contract made into by a minor void or voidable in this case? The issue of whether a minor who lacks legal capacity enters into a contract and what scenarios and circumstances might result also comes into dispute. A person is a minor, according to Section 3 of the India Majority Act of 1875, if they have reached the age of 18, with the exception of situations in which a court has assigned a guardian, in which case they are said to have reached majority at the age of 21. Although everyone is capable of entering into a contract under the Indian Contract Act of 1872, Section 11, there are three exceptions: minors, those who are mentally ill, and people who are prohibited by law.

Keywords
contractguardianIndian Contract Actminorvoidable

How to cite

Abhimanyu Suresh Nawghare, Case Analysis – Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose, 6 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 3121 (2023).

Cite this article

Abhimanyu Suresh Nawghare, Case Analysis – Mohori Bibee v. Dharmodas Ghose, 6 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 3121 (2023).
Chat with us