Abstract

The research critically explores the interference with animals' rights due to their confinement in zoos, with a special focus on Chennai. This topic was chosen due to the ethical dilemma of balancing wildlife conservation and public education with the rights and welfare of animals in captivity. The study aims to assess the impact of caging on animals' physical and psychological well-being, analyse the effectiveness of legal frameworks like the Wildlife Protection Act and Central Zoo Authority guidelines, and compare practices in Chennai’s zoos with global standards. Employing an empirical methodology, the research gathers primary data through surveys and interviews with zoo officials, visitors, and animal welfare activists, complemented by secondary data from legislative and policy reviews. Key findings reveal that while Chennai's zoos have made strides in conservation and education, challenges persist, such as inadequate infrastructure, limited enrichment opportunities, and insufficient public awareness of animal rights. The study highlights a disconnect between policy intentions and ground-level implementation. The conclusion underscores the need for ethical reforms, enhanced public engagement, and stricter enforcement of welfare standards. By addressing these gaps, the research advocates a balanced approach that aligns conservation goals with the humane treatment of animals, fostering a compassionate and informed society.

Keywords