VidhiAagaz
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
ISSN 2581-5369 · Open access
International Journal ofLaw Management & Humanities
Open accessArticleVol. 1 No. II (2018)pp. 230–234

Authenticity of the Accomplice Evidence

GA
Gauri AgrawalLaw College Dehradun, Faculty of Uttranchal University, Dehradun, India
View PDF
19views0downloads
Published 17 July 2018 · pp. 230–234 · Vol. 1 No. II (2018)
Abstract

Accomplice is dealt under Section 133 of the Indian Evidence Act. Though Accomplice has no where been defined in the Indian Evidence Act, therefore in ordinary sense it is viewed as a person who has taken part in the commission of crime along with other wrongdoers. This article talks about the authenticity as well as admissibility of the accomplice in the court of law. Most of the time, accomplice evidence might seem to be untrustworthy and unreliable but often it comes out as an invaluable evidence in solving the crime and delivering justice. Further it will talk about the accomplice being a competent witness and how it differs from the co-accused.

Keywords
Accomplice evidenceSection 133 Indian Evidence ActCorroborationApproverAdmissibilityCriminal trial

How to cite

Gauri Agrawal, Authenticity of the Accomplice Evidence, 1 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 230 (2018).

Cite this article

Gauri Agrawal, Authenticity of the Accomplice Evidence, 1 Int'l J.L. Mgmt. & Human. 230 (2018).
Chat with us