Home Archives Volume 3, Issue 4 Articles Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Article Vol. 3 No. 4 (2020) PP. 1592 - 1604

Analysis of the Constitutional Validity of Member of Parliament – Local Area Development (MPLAD) Scheme and Its Suspension amidst Covid-19

Lead author · Corresponding
Amrith. R
student of School Of Excellence In Law, The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Chennai
Co-author
R. Gireeshvaran
student of School Of Excellence In Law, The Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, Chennai
View PDF Full text
1 views 0 downloads
Abstract

Members of Parliament Local Area Development – MPLAD - Scheme was introduced in India in 1993 to empower Members of Parliament of the Lok Sabha to initiate and introduce developmental measures in their constituencies with prioritizing the creation of long-lasting communal assets that were needed for the local population. Every Member of Parliament is eligible to get Rs. 5 crores annually. These funds, which are under the discretion of an MP, are to be used for fulfilling the development or basic needs of the people in his/her constituency. Although the constitutional validity of the MPLAD scheme had come into judicial scrutiny several times in the past, on several grounds, the Supreme Court of India upheld its constitutionality, by relying heavily on various case precedents, holding that the separation of powers was not strictly recognized in the Indian Constitution. The COVID-19 pandemic forced the Government of India to suspend the MPLAD scheme for the next two years, on the ground that it is focusing more upon whole needs, requirements, planning, and execution on a national level rather than filling upon root requirements of remote areas. The Government’s decision to suspend the scheme, despite the political backlash, notwithstanding, the SC’s judgement, prompts the need to analyse, in-depth, the scheme, its implementation, and the legal questions surrounding it. The paper aims to discuss the aforementioned questions comprehensively .

Type
Article
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 3, Issue 4, Page 1592 - 1604
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation


        
📢 Call for Papers — Volume IX Issue IV now open  ·  Impact Factor 7.010  ·  Indexed in HeinOnline, Manupatra & Google Scholar + 1000+ Libraries  ·  Free DOI Submit Now →
Chat with us