Abstract

The case comment discusses the landmark decision of the Supreme Court of India in Cox and Kings Ltd. v. SAP India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr., which legitimised the inclusion of non-signatory third parties in arbitration proceedings under the "group of companies" doctrine. The case highlights the evolving nature of Indian arbitration jurisprudence and its alignment with international practices. The abstract outlines the key facts of the case, including the software licensing agreement between Cox and Kings Ltd. (C&K) and SAP India Pvt. Ltd., the subsequent agreements, and the dispute that arose leading to arbitration proceedings. It then summarises the Supreme Court's ratio decidendi, which establishes that an arbitration award can be passed against a non-signatory party if they are part of the same group of companies and have dealt with the business along with the signatory parties. The abstract provides background information on the UNCITRAL Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration and its influence on the Arbitration Act of India, 1996. It also analyses the submissions made by the petitioner and respondents, as well as the Supreme Court's decision to recognise the "group of companies" doctrine as part of Indian arbitration law. The abstract concludes by highlighting the significance of the decision in Cox and Kings, which serves as an authoritative discussion on the applicability of the "group of companies" doctrine in India. It emphasises the need for corporate groups to structure their transactions and conduct appropriately to ensure that only the intended parties are bound by the arbitration agreement.

Keywords