Difference in Treatment of Claim by the Liquidator and the IRP
Lead author · Corresponding
Soni Maurya
Student at Dr. Harisingh Gour University, Sagar (A Central University), M.P., India
View PDF
Full text
DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.112147
Abstract
In the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) initiated under the I&B Code 2016 (Code), Claims are a very important concept in the IBC regime. Sections 18 and 25 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) lay down the duties of an interim resolution professional (IRP) and a resolution professional (RP) respectively. The provisions of Code strive on the protection of interest of creditors of a company which is under CIRP while completing the insolvency resolution process in a time-bound manner. The IBC is fortified with mechanisms to reduce and efficiently deal with the rejection of claims, creditors whose claims are rejected would continue to face prejudice.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.