Home / Volume 7, Issue 2 / A Comparative Analysis of Socio-legal Live-in Relationships in… Open access · CC BY-NC 4.0
Research Paper Volume 7 Issue 2 1554 - 1567 April 6, 2024

A Comparative Analysis of Socio-legal Live-in Relationships in Different Countries and Nepal’s Viewpoint

Lead author · Corresponding
Diwakar Dhakal
Student at Kathmandu School of Law, Nepal
Download PDF Full text DOIhttps://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.117179
Abstract

The main focus of this research is to comparatively analyze the social and legal position of Live-in relationships in different countries in contrast to Nepal. It delves into the historicity from the Garden of Eden to the Gandharva marriage and the increasing popularity of cohabitation from western societies to the eastern. Since the late 20th century, living together before marriage has become a standard facet in the process of relationship formation among young adults compared to traditional marriage. How different countries have addressed live-in relationships through legislation, providing examples from the United States of America, United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, France, Ireland, Scotland, Philippines, China and India. It underlines the laxity of specific laws governing live-in relationships in Nepal, although certain provisions offer limited legal protection in specific situations. An acknowledgement of both traditional values and the evolving needs of an expanding Nepalese society is required to formalize live-in relationships.

Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Law Management and Humanities, Volume 7, Issue 2, Page 1554 - 1567
DOI: https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.117179
Creative Commons
CC BY-NC 4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution–NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits remixing, adapting, and building upon the work for non-commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © IJLMH 2026
Disclaimer
The views and opinions expressed in this manuscript are those of the author(s) alone and do not reflect the views, policies, or position of the Journal.

Export citation